Compare-Cities.com
Compare Birmingham to Rochester Hills
This post compares Birmingham, Michigan to Rochester Hills, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Birmingham (city) | Rochester Hills (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 20,836 | 73,458 |
Income (median) | $98,316 | $72,570 |
Home Value (median) | $467,700 | $264,400 |
White | 91% | 80% |
Black | 2% | 4% |
Asian | 2% | 11% |
With Kids | 29% | 31% |
Age (median) | 41 | 41 |
Rentals | 25% | 23% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Birmingham or Rochester Hills?
A: Birmingham has a much smaller population count than Rochester Hills: 20836 compared with 73458 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Birmingham or in Rochester Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Birmingham.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Birmingham or Rochester Hills?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Birmingham.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Birmingham does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 25% for Birmingham versus 23% for Rochester Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Birmingham may include: Forest-Hills, Rochester-Hills, and Novi.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z