Compare-Cities.com
Compare Birmingham to Mount Pleasant
This post compares Birmingham, Michigan to Mount Pleasant, Michigan across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Birmingham (city) | Mount Pleasant (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,836 | 25,711 |
| Income (median) | $98,316 | $36,806 |
| Home Value (median) | $467,700 | $131,900 |
| White | 91% | 85% |
| Black | 2% | 3% |
| Asian | 2% | 3% |
| With Kids | 29% | 21% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 22 |
| Rentals | 25% | 60% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Birmingham or Mount Pleasant?
A: Birmingham has a similar population count than Mount Pleasant: 20836 compared with 25711 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Birmingham or in Mount Pleasant?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Birmingham.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Birmingham or Mount Pleasant?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Birmingham.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Mount Pleasant does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 25% for Birmingham versus 60% for Mount Pleasant.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Birmingham may include: Forest-Hills, Rochester-Hills, and Novi.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z