Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pittsfield to Malden
This post compares Pittsfield, Massachusetts to Malden, Massachusetts across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pittsfield (city) | Malden (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,289 | 61,212 |
| Income (median) | $46,852 | $49,978 |
| Home Value (median) | $173,100 | $359,700 |
| White | 87% | 53% |
| Black | 4% | 16% |
| Asian | 1% | 23% |
| With Kids | 25% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 35 |
| Rentals | 38% | 59% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pittsfield or Malden?
A: Pittsfield has a smaller population count than Malden: 43289 compared with 61212 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pittsfield or in Malden?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Pittsfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pittsfield or Malden?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Pittsfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Malden does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Pittsfield versus 59% for Malden.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pittsfield may include: Chicopee, Peabody, and West-Springfield.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z