Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pittsfield to Chelsea
This post compares Pittsfield, Massachusetts to Chelsea, Massachusetts across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Pittsfield (city) | Chelsea (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 43,289 | 39,272 |
Income (median) | $46,852 | $38,658 |
Home Value (median) | $173,100 | $308,300 |
White | 87% | 49% |
Black | 4% | 7% |
Asian | 1% | 3% |
With Kids | 25% | 40% |
Age (median) | 43 | 33 |
Rentals | 38% | 74% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pittsfield or Chelsea?
A: Pittsfield has a similar population count than Chelsea: 43289 compared with 39272 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pittsfield or in Chelsea?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Pittsfield.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pittsfield or Chelsea?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Pittsfield.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Chelsea does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Pittsfield versus 74% for Chelsea.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pittsfield may include: Chicopee, Peabody, and West-Springfield.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z