Compare-Cities.com
Compare Medford to Attleboro
This post compares Medford, Massachusetts to Attleboro, Massachusetts across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Medford (city) | Attleboro (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 57,700 | 44,326 |
| Income (median) | $62,179 | $54,094 |
| Home Value (median) | $443,100 | $273,900 |
| White | 77% | 87% |
| Black | 8% | 3% |
| Asian | 9% | 4% |
| With Kids | 21% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 40 |
| Rentals | 42% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Medford or Attleboro?
A: Medford has a larger population count than Attleboro: 57700 compared with 44326 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Medford or in Attleboro?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Medford.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Medford or Attleboro?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Medford.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Medford does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Medford versus 33% for Attleboro.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Medford may include: Waltham, Watertown, and Salem.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z