Compare-Cities.com
Compare Malden to Pittsfield
This post compares Malden, Massachusetts to Pittsfield, Massachusetts across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Malden (city) | Pittsfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 61,212 | 43,289 |
| Income (median) | $49,978 | $46,852 |
| Home Value (median) | $359,700 | $173,100 |
| White | 53% | 87% |
| Black | 16% | 4% |
| Asian | 23% | 1% |
| With Kids | 30% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 43 |
| Rentals | 59% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Malden or Pittsfield?
A: Malden has a larger population count than Pittsfield: 61212 compared with 43289 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Malden or in Pittsfield?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Malden.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Malden or Pittsfield?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Malden.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Malden does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 59% for Malden versus 38% for Pittsfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Malden may include: Lowell, Quincy, and Lynn.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z