Compare-Cities.com
Compare Gloucester to Pittsfield
This post compares Gloucester, Massachusetts to Pittsfield, Massachusetts across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Gloucester (city) | Pittsfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,858 | 43,289 |
| Income (median) | $52,419 | $46,852 |
| Home Value (median) | $381,000 | $173,100 |
| White | 95% | 87% |
| Black | 1% | 4% |
| Asian | 1% | 1% |
| With Kids | 22% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 49 | 43 |
| Rentals | 36% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Gloucester or Pittsfield?
A: Gloucester has a smaller population count than Pittsfield: 29858 compared with 43289 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Gloucester or in Pittsfield?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Gloucester.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Gloucester or Pittsfield?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Gloucester.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pittsfield does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 36% for Gloucester versus 38% for Pittsfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Gloucester may include: Barnstable, Peabody, and Stoneham.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z