Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fitchburg to Wellesley
This post compares Fitchburg, Massachusetts to Wellesley, Massachusetts across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Fitchburg (city) | Wellesley (CDP) |
---|---|---|
Population | 40,666 | 29,004 |
Income (median) | $44,662 | $133,980 |
Home Value (median) | $183,400 | $1,042,300 |
White | 80% | 82% |
Black | 3% | 3% |
Asian | 4% | 11% |
With Kids | 31% | 42% |
Age (median) | 35 | 35 |
Rentals | 47% | 17% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fitchburg or Wellesley?
A: Fitchburg has a larger population count than Wellesley: 40666 compared with 29004 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fitchburg or in Wellesley?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Fitchburg.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fitchburg or Wellesley?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Fitchburg.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fitchburg does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 47% for Fitchburg versus 17% for Wellesley.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fitchburg may include: Holyoke, Leominster, and West-Springfield.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z