Compare-Cities.com
Compare Chelsea to Pittsfield
This post compares Chelsea, Massachusetts to Pittsfield, Massachusetts across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Chelsea (city) | Pittsfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 39,272 | 43,289 |
| Income (median) | $38,658 | $46,852 |
| Home Value (median) | $308,300 | $173,100 |
| White | 49% | 87% |
| Black | 7% | 4% |
| Asian | 3% | 1% |
| With Kids | 40% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 43 |
| Rentals | 74% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Chelsea or Pittsfield?
A: Chelsea has a similar population count than Pittsfield: 39272 compared with 43289 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Chelsea or in Pittsfield?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Chelsea.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Chelsea or Pittsfield?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Chelsea.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Chelsea does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 74% for Chelsea versus 38% for Pittsfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Chelsea may include: Lawrence, Lynn, and Everett.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z