Compare-Cities.com
Compare Belmont to Pittsfield
This post compares Belmont, Massachusetts to Pittsfield, Massachusetts across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Belmont (CDP) | Pittsfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,965 | 43,289 |
| Income (median) | $86,036 | $46,852 |
| Home Value (median) | $759,500 | $173,100 |
| White | 79% | 87% |
| Black | 1% | 4% |
| Asian | 15% | 1% |
| With Kids | 38% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 43 |
| Rentals | 36% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Belmont or Pittsfield?
A: Belmont has a smaller population count than Pittsfield: 25965 compared with 43289 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Belmont or in Pittsfield?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Belmont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Belmont or Pittsfield?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Belmont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pittsfield does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 36% for Belmont versus 38% for Pittsfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Belmont may include: Newton, Arlington, and Burlington.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z