Compare-Cities.com
Compare Waukegan to Grayslake
This post compares Waukegan, Illinois to Grayslake, Illinois across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Waukegan (city) | Grayslake (village) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 87,999 | 21,168 |
| Income (median) | $31,937 | $63,835 |
| Home Value (median) | $120,300 | $220,700 |
| White | 58% | 81% |
| Black | 17% | 3% |
| Asian | 5% | 7% |
| With Kids | 43% | 37% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 37 |
| Rentals | 53% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Waukegan or Grayslake?
A: Waukegan has a much larger population count than Grayslake: 87999 compared with 21168 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Waukegan or in Grayslake?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Waukegan.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Waukegan or Grayslake?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Waukegan.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Waukegan does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 53% for Waukegan versus 30% for Grayslake.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Waukegan may include: Melrose-Park, Zion, and Berwyn.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z