Compare-Cities.com
Compare Urbana to Skokie
This post compares Urbana, Illinois to Skokie, Illinois across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Urbana (city) | Skokie (village) |
---|---|---|
Population | 42,141 | 64,773 |
Income (median) | $39,509 | $53,548 |
Home Value (median) | $146,700 | $291,200 |
White | 59% | 60% |
Black | 16% | 6% |
Asian | 19% | 26% |
With Kids | 18% | 31% |
Age (median) | 24 | 43 |
Rentals | 61% | 27% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Urbana or Skokie?
A: Urbana has a smaller population count than Skokie: 42141 compared with 64773 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Urbana or in Skokie?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Urbana.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Urbana or Skokie?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Urbana.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Urbana does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 61% for Urbana versus 27% for Skokie.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Urbana may include: Champaign, Carbondale, and DeKalb.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z