Compare-Cities.com
Compare Urbana to North Chicago
This post compares Urbana, Illinois to North Chicago, Illinois across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Urbana (city) | North Chicago (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 42,141 | 30,013 |
| Income (median) | $39,509 | $24,317 |
| Home Value (median) | $146,700 | $104,600 |
| White | 59% | 54% |
| Black | 16% | 27% |
| Asian | 19% | 4% |
| With Kids | 18% | 37% |
| Age (median) | 24 | 24 |
| Rentals | 61% | 65% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Urbana or North Chicago?
A: Urbana has a larger population count than North Chicago: 42141 compared with 30013 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Urbana or in North Chicago?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Urbana.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Urbana or North Chicago?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Urbana.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: North Chicago does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 61% for Urbana versus 65% for North Chicago.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Urbana may include: Champaign, Carbondale, and DeKalb.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z