Compare-Cities.com
Compare Urbana to Lake in the Hills
This post compares Urbana, Illinois to Lake in the Hills, Illinois across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Urbana (city) | Lake in the Hills (village) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 42,141 | 28,908 |
| Income (median) | $39,509 | $55,724 |
| Home Value (median) | $146,700 | $211,000 |
| White | 59% | 88% |
| Black | 16% | 2% |
| Asian | 19% | 4% |
| With Kids | 18% | 45% |
| Age (median) | 24 | 34 |
| Rentals | 61% | 17% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Urbana or Lake in the Hills?
A: Urbana has a larger population count than Lake in the Hills: 42141 compared with 28908 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Urbana or in Lake in the Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Urbana.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Urbana or Lake in the Hills?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Urbana.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Urbana does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 61% for Urbana versus 17% for Lake in the Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Urbana may include: Champaign, Carbondale, and DeKalb.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z