Compare-Cities.com
Compare Urbana to Highland Park
This post compares Urbana, Illinois to Highland Park, Illinois across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Urbana (city) | Highland Park (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 42,141 | 29,796 |
| Income (median) | $39,509 | $102,697 |
| Home Value (median) | $146,700 | $574,100 |
| White | 59% | 92% |
| Black | 16% | 1% |
| Asian | 19% | 2% |
| With Kids | 18% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 24 | 46 |
| Rentals | 61% | 17% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Urbana or Highland Park?
A: Urbana has a larger population count than Highland Park: 42141 compared with 29796 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Urbana or in Highland Park?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Urbana.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Urbana or Highland Park?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Urbana.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Urbana does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 61% for Urbana versus 17% for Highland Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Urbana may include: Champaign, Carbondale, and DeKalb.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z