Compare-Cities.com
Compare Urbana to Grayslake
This post compares Urbana, Illinois to Grayslake, Illinois across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Urbana (city) | Grayslake (village) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 42,141 | 21,168 |
| Income (median) | $39,509 | $63,835 |
| Home Value (median) | $146,700 | $220,700 |
| White | 59% | 81% |
| Black | 16% | 3% |
| Asian | 19% | 7% |
| With Kids | 18% | 37% |
| Age (median) | 24 | 37 |
| Rentals | 61% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Urbana or Grayslake?
A: Urbana has a larger population count than Grayslake: 42141 compared with 21168 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Urbana or in Grayslake?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Urbana.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Urbana or Grayslake?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Urbana.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Urbana does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 61% for Urbana versus 30% for Grayslake.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Urbana may include: Champaign, Carbondale, and DeKalb.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z