Compare-Cities.com
Compare Urbana to Chicago Heights
This post compares Urbana, Illinois to Chicago Heights, Illinois across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Urbana (city) | Chicago Heights (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 42,141 | 30,292 |
| Income (median) | $39,509 | $40,740 |
| Home Value (median) | $146,700 | $98,300 |
| White | 59% | 34% |
| Black | 16% | 42% |
| Asian | 19% | 0% |
| With Kids | 18% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 24 | 34 |
| Rentals | 61% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Urbana or Chicago Heights?
A: Urbana has a larger population count than Chicago Heights: 42141 compared with 30292 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Urbana or in Chicago Heights?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Urbana.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Urbana or Chicago Heights?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Urbana.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Urbana does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 61% for Urbana versus 40% for Chicago Heights.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Urbana may include: Champaign, Carbondale, and DeKalb.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z