Compare-Cities.com
Compare North Chicago to Urbana
This post compares North Chicago, Illinois to Urbana, Illinois across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | North Chicago (city) | Urbana (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,013 | 42,141 |
| Income (median) | $24,317 | $39,509 |
| Home Value (median) | $104,600 | $146,700 |
| White | 54% | 59% |
| Black | 27% | 16% |
| Asian | 4% | 19% |
| With Kids | 37% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 24 | 24 |
| Rentals | 65% | 61% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, North Chicago or Urbana?
A: North Chicago has a smaller population count than Urbana: 30013 compared with 42141 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in North Chicago or in Urbana?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in North Chicago.
Q: Are homes more expensive in North Chicago or Urbana?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in North Chicago.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: North Chicago does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 65% for North Chicago versus 61% for Urbana.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to North Chicago may include: Waukegan, DeKalb, and Carbondale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z