Compare-Cities.com
Compare North Chicago to Grayslake
This post compares North Chicago, Illinois to Grayslake, Illinois across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | North Chicago (city) | Grayslake (village) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,013 | 21,168 |
| Income (median) | $24,317 | $63,835 |
| Home Value (median) | $104,600 | $220,700 |
| White | 54% | 81% |
| Black | 27% | 3% |
| Asian | 4% | 7% |
| With Kids | 37% | 37% |
| Age (median) | 24 | 37 |
| Rentals | 65% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, North Chicago or Grayslake?
A: North Chicago has a larger population count than Grayslake: 30013 compared with 21168 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in North Chicago or in Grayslake?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in North Chicago.
Q: Are homes more expensive in North Chicago or Grayslake?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in North Chicago.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: North Chicago does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 65% for North Chicago versus 30% for Grayslake.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to North Chicago may include: Waukegan, DeKalb, and Carbondale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z