Compare-Cities.com
Compare Naperville to Grayslake
This post compares Naperville, Illinois to Grayslake, Illinois across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Naperville (city) | Grayslake (village) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 146,431 | 21,168 |
| Income (median) | $82,584 | $63,835 |
| Home Value (median) | $398,500 | $220,700 |
| White | 73% | 81% |
| Black | 5% | 3% |
| Asian | 17% | 7% |
| With Kids | 39% | 37% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 37 |
| Rentals | 24% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Naperville or Grayslake?
A: Naperville has a much larger population count than Grayslake: 146431 compared with 21168 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Naperville or in Grayslake?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Naperville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Naperville or Grayslake?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Naperville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Grayslake does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Naperville versus 30% for Grayslake.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Naperville may include: Vernon-Hills, Buffalo-Grove, and Glen-Ellyn.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z