Compare-Cities.com
Compare Grayslake to Urbana
This post compares Grayslake, Illinois to Urbana, Illinois across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Grayslake (village) | Urbana (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,168 | 42,141 |
| Income (median) | $63,835 | $39,509 |
| Home Value (median) | $220,700 | $146,700 |
| White | 81% | 59% |
| Black | 3% | 16% |
| Asian | 7% | 19% |
| With Kids | 37% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 24 |
| Rentals | 30% | 61% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Grayslake or Urbana?
A: Grayslake has a smaller population count than Urbana: 21168 compared with 42141 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Grayslake or in Urbana?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Grayslake.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Grayslake or Urbana?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Grayslake.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Urbana does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Grayslake versus 61% for Urbana.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Grayslake may include: Gurnee, OFallon, and Villa-Park.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z