Compare-Cities.com
Compare Grayslake to North Chicago
This post compares Grayslake, Illinois to North Chicago, Illinois across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Grayslake (village) | North Chicago (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,168 | 30,013 |
| Income (median) | $63,835 | $24,317 |
| Home Value (median) | $220,700 | $104,600 |
| White | 81% | 54% |
| Black | 3% | 27% |
| Asian | 7% | 4% |
| With Kids | 37% | 37% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 24 |
| Rentals | 30% | 65% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Grayslake or North Chicago?
A: Grayslake has a smaller population count than North Chicago: 21168 compared with 30013 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Grayslake or in North Chicago?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Grayslake.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Grayslake or North Chicago?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Grayslake.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: North Chicago does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Grayslake versus 65% for North Chicago.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Grayslake may include: Gurnee, OFallon, and Villa-Park.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z