Compare-Cities.com
Compare Grayslake to Chicago
This post compares Grayslake, Illinois to Chicago, Illinois across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Grayslake (village) | Chicago (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 21,168 | 2,722,586 |
Income (median) | $63,835 | $49,309 |
Home Value (median) | $220,700 | $234,500 |
White | 81% | 49% |
Black | 3% | 30% |
Asian | 7% | 6% |
With Kids | 37% | 27% |
Age (median) | 37 | 34 |
Rentals | 30% | 55% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Grayslake or Chicago?
A: Grayslake has a much smaller population count than Chicago: 21168 compared with 2722586 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Grayslake or in Chicago?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Grayslake.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Grayslake or Chicago?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Grayslake.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Chicago does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Grayslake versus 55% for Chicago.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Grayslake may include: Gurnee, OFallon, and Villa-Park.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z