Compare-Cities.com
Compare Grayslake to Chicago Heights
This post compares Grayslake, Illinois to Chicago Heights, Illinois across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Grayslake (village) | Chicago Heights (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,168 | 30,292 |
| Income (median) | $63,835 | $40,740 |
| Home Value (median) | $220,700 | $98,300 |
| White | 81% | 34% |
| Black | 3% | 42% |
| Asian | 7% | 0% |
| With Kids | 37% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 34 |
| Rentals | 30% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Grayslake or Chicago Heights?
A: Grayslake has a smaller population count than Chicago Heights: 21168 compared with 30292 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Grayslake or in Chicago Heights?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Grayslake.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Grayslake or Chicago Heights?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Grayslake.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Chicago Heights does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Grayslake versus 40% for Chicago Heights.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Grayslake may include: Gurnee, OFallon, and Villa-Park.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z