Compare-Cities.com
Compare Chicago to Urbana
This post compares Chicago, Illinois to Urbana, Illinois across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Chicago (city) | Urbana (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,722,586 | 42,141 |
Income (median) | $49,309 | $39,509 |
Home Value (median) | $234,500 | $146,700 |
White | 49% | 59% |
Black | 30% | 16% |
Asian | 6% | 19% |
With Kids | 27% | 18% |
Age (median) | 34 | 24 |
Rentals | 55% | 61% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Chicago or Urbana?
A: Chicago has a much larger population count than Urbana: 2722586 compared with 42141 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Chicago or in Urbana?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Chicago.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Chicago or Urbana?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Chicago.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Urbana does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 55% for Chicago versus 61% for Urbana.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Chicago may include: Rockford, Peoria, and Aurora.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z