Compare-Cities.com
Compare Chicago to Grayslake
This post compares Chicago, Illinois to Grayslake, Illinois across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Chicago (city) | Grayslake (village) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,722,586 | 21,168 |
| Income (median) | $49,309 | $63,835 |
| Home Value (median) | $234,500 | $220,700 |
| White | 49% | 81% |
| Black | 30% | 3% |
| Asian | 6% | 7% |
| With Kids | 27% | 37% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 37 |
| Rentals | 55% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Chicago or Grayslake?
A: Chicago has a much larger population count than Grayslake: 2722586 compared with 21168 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Chicago or in Grayslake?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Chicago.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Chicago or Grayslake?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Chicago.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Chicago does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 55% for Chicago versus 30% for Grayslake.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Chicago may include: Rockford, Peoria, and Aurora.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z