Compare-Cities.com
Compare Chicago Heights to Urbana
This post compares Chicago Heights, Illinois to Urbana, Illinois across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Chicago Heights (city) | Urbana (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,292 | 42,141 |
| Income (median) | $40,740 | $39,509 |
| Home Value (median) | $98,300 | $146,700 |
| White | 34% | 59% |
| Black | 42% | 16% |
| Asian | 0% | 19% |
| With Kids | 35% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 24 |
| Rentals | 40% | 61% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Chicago Heights or Urbana?
A: Chicago Heights has a smaller population count than Urbana: 30292 compared with 42141 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Chicago Heights or in Urbana?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Chicago Heights.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Chicago Heights or Urbana?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Chicago Heights.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Urbana does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 40% for Chicago Heights versus 61% for Urbana.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Chicago Heights may include: Blue-Island, Kankakee, and Park-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z