Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Grayslake
This post compares Burbank, Illinois to Grayslake, Illinois across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | Grayslake (village) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,081 | 21,168 |
| Income (median) | $40,708 | $63,835 |
| Home Value (median) | $174,200 | $220,700 |
| White | 82% | 81% |
| Black | 3% | 3% |
| Asian | 1% | 7% |
| With Kids | 37% | 37% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 37 |
| Rentals | 22% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Grayslake?
A: Burbank has a larger population count than Grayslake: 29081 compared with 21168 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Grayslake?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Grayslake?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Grayslake does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 22% for Burbank versus 30% for Grayslake.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Machesney-Park, McHenry, and Belvidere.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z