Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rome to Warner Robins
This post compares Rome, Georgia to Warner Robins, Georgia across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rome (city) | Warner Robins (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 36,029 | 74,123 |
| Income (median) | $33,455 | $40,215 |
| Home Value (median) | $141,600 | $110,500 |
| White | 62% | 51% |
| Black | 27% | 38% |
| Asian | 3% | 3% |
| With Kids | 30% | 37% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 32 |
| Rentals | 55% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rome or Warner Robins?
A: Rome has a much smaller population count than Warner Robins: 36029 compared with 74123 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rome or in Warner Robins?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Rome.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rome or Warner Robins?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Rome.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Rome does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 55% for Rome versus 46% for Warner Robins.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rome may include: Lawrenceville, Marietta, and Cartersville.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z