Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Springs to Oakland Park
This post compares Palm Springs, Florida to Oakland Park, Florida across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Springs (village) | Oakland Park (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,455 | 44,085 |
| Income (median) | $30,473 | $37,241 |
| Home Value (median) | $111,500 | $174,900 |
| White | 79% | 57% |
| Black | 14% | 28% |
| Asian | 1% | 4% |
| With Kids | 35% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 41 |
| Rentals | 54% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Springs or Oakland Park?
A: Palm Springs has a smaller population count than Oakland Park: 24455 compared with 44085 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Springs or in Oakland Park?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Palm Springs.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Springs or Oakland Park?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Palm Springs.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palm Springs does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Palm Springs versus 46% for Oakland Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Springs may include: Four-Corners, Lake-Worth, and Country-Club.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z