Compare-Cities.com
Compare Palm Coast to Oakland Park
This post compares Palm Coast, Florida to Oakland Park, Florida across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Palm Coast (city) | Oakland Park (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 82,356 | 44,085 |
| Income (median) | $35,809 | $37,241 |
| Home Value (median) | $181,400 | $174,900 |
| White | 80% | 57% |
| Black | 11% | 28% |
| Asian | 2% | 4% |
| With Kids | 24% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 47 | 41 |
| Rentals | 24% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Palm Coast or Oakland Park?
A: Palm Coast has a larger population count than Oakland Park: 82356 compared with 44085 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Palm Coast or in Oakland Park?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Palm Coast.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Palm Coast or Oakland Park?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Palm Coast.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Oakland Park does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 24% for Palm Coast versus 46% for Oakland Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Palm Coast may include: North-Port, Port-Orange, and Rockledge.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z