Compare-Cities.com
Compare Westminster to South San Francisco
This post compares Westminster, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Westminster (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 91,785 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $43,283 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $546,200 | $697,400 |
| White | 39% | 33% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 48% | 39% |
| With Kids | 35% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 39 |
| Rentals | 47% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Westminster or South San Francisco?
A: Westminster has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 91785 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Westminster or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Westminster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Westminster or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Westminster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Westminster does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 47% for Westminster versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Westminster may include: South-San-Francisco, Garden-Grove, and San-Gabriel.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z