Compare-Cities.com
Compare Westminster to Pasadena
This post compares Westminster, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Westminster (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 91,785 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $43,283 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $546,200 | $689,700 |
| White | 39% | 53% |
| Black | 0% | 10% |
| Asian | 48% | 16% |
| With Kids | 35% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 37 |
| Rentals | 47% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Westminster or Pasadena?
A: Westminster has a smaller population count than Pasadena: 91785 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Westminster or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Westminster.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Westminster or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Westminster.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 47% for Westminster versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Westminster may include: South-San-Francisco, Garden-Grove, and San-Gabriel.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z