Compare-Cities.com
Compare West Sacramento to South Pasadena
This post compares West Sacramento, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | West Sacramento (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 52,206 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $50,206 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $304,600 | $928,500 |
| White | 67% | 54% |
| Black | 4% | 3% |
| Asian | 10% | 29% |
| With Kids | 39% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 40 |
| Rentals | 46% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, West Sacramento or South Pasadena?
A: West Sacramento has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 52206 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in West Sacramento or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in West Sacramento.
Q: Are homes more expensive in West Sacramento or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in West Sacramento.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for West Sacramento versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to West Sacramento may include: Manteca, Clovis, and Woodland.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z