Compare-Cities.com
Compare Watsonville to South San Francisco
This post compares Watsonville, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Watsonville (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 53,452 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $31,969 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $397,900 | $697,400 |
| White | 55% | 33% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 2% | 39% |
| With Kids | 51% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 29 | 39 |
| Rentals | 58% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Watsonville or South San Francisco?
A: Watsonville has a similar population count than South San Francisco: 53452 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Watsonville or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Watsonville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Watsonville or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Watsonville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Watsonville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 58% for Watsonville versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Watsonville may include: South-Gate, Salinas, and East-Los-Angeles.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z