Compare-Cities.com
Compare Watsonville to Riverbank
This post compares Watsonville, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Watsonville (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 53,452 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $31,969 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $397,900 | $247,200 |
| White | 55% | 79% |
| Black | 0% | 0% |
| Asian | 2% | 4% |
| With Kids | 51% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 29 | 32 |
| Rentals | 58% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Watsonville or Riverbank?
A: Watsonville has a larger population count than Riverbank: 53452 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Watsonville or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Watsonville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Watsonville or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Watsonville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Watsonville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 58% for Watsonville versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Watsonville may include: South-Gate, Salinas, and East-Los-Angeles.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z