Compare-Cities.com
Compare Watsonville to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Watsonville, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Watsonville (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 53,452 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $31,969 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $397,900 | $444,200 |
| White | 55% | 62% |
| Black | 0% | 9% |
| Asian | 2% | 13% |
| With Kids | 51% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 29 | 35 |
| Rentals | 58% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Watsonville or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Watsonville has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 53452 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Watsonville or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Watsonville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Watsonville or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Watsonville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Watsonville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 58% for Watsonville versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Watsonville may include: South-Gate, Salinas, and East-Los-Angeles.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z