Compare-Cities.com
Compare Watsonville to Pleasant Hill
This post compares Watsonville, California to Pleasant Hill, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Watsonville (city) | Pleasant Hill (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 53,452 | 34,662 |
| Income (median) | $31,969 | $77,000 |
| Home Value (median) | $397,900 | $633,400 |
| White | 55% | 75% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 2% | 13% |
| With Kids | 51% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 29 | 39 |
| Rentals | 58% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Watsonville or Pleasant Hill?
A: Watsonville has a larger population count than Pleasant Hill: 53452 compared with 34662 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Watsonville or in Pleasant Hill?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Watsonville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Watsonville or Pleasant Hill?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Watsonville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Watsonville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 58% for Watsonville versus 39% for Pleasant Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Watsonville may include: South-Gate, Salinas, and East-Los-Angeles.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z