Compare-Cities.com
Compare Watsonville to Foster City
This post compares Watsonville, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Watsonville (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 53,452 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $31,969 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $397,900 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 55% | 43% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 2% | 47% |
| With Kids | 51% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 29 | 40 |
| Rentals | 58% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Watsonville or Foster City?
A: Watsonville has a larger population count than Foster City: 53452 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Watsonville or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Watsonville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Watsonville or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Watsonville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Watsonville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 58% for Watsonville versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Watsonville may include: South-Gate, Salinas, and East-Los-Angeles.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z