Compare-Cities.com
Compare Wasco to South San Francisco
This post compares Wasco, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Wasco (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,378 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $31,042 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $155,800 | $697,400 |
| White | 78% | 33% |
| Black | 6% | 2% |
| Asian | 0% | 39% |
| With Kids | 59% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 28 | 39 |
| Rentals | 45% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Wasco or South San Francisco?
A: Wasco has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 26378 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Wasco or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Wasco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Wasco or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Wasco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Wasco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Wasco versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Wasco may include: Madera, Delano, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z