Compare-Cities.com
Compare Wasco to South Pasadena
This post compares Wasco, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Wasco (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,378 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $31,042 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $155,800 | $928,500 |
| White | 78% | 54% |
| Black | 6% | 3% |
| Asian | 0% | 29% |
| With Kids | 59% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 28 | 40 |
| Rentals | 45% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Wasco or South Pasadena?
A: Wasco has a similar population count than South Pasadena: 26378 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Wasco or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Wasco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Wasco or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Wasco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Wasco versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Wasco may include: Madera, Delano, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z