Compare-Cities.com
Compare Wasco to Reedley
This post compares Wasco, California to Reedley, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Wasco (city) | Reedley (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,378 | 25,419 |
| Income (median) | $31,042 | $32,215 |
| Home Value (median) | $155,800 | $174,100 |
| White | 78% | 73% |
| Black | 6% | 1% |
| Asian | 0% | 3% |
| With Kids | 59% | 43% |
| Age (median) | 28 | 31 |
| Rentals | 45% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Wasco or Reedley?
A: Wasco has a similar population count than Reedley: 26378 compared with 25419 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Wasco or in Reedley?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Wasco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Wasco or Reedley?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Wasco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Wasco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Wasco versus 38% for Reedley.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Wasco may include: Madera, Delano, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z