Compare-Cities.com
Compare Wasco to Pico Rivera
This post compares Wasco, California to Pico Rivera, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Wasco (city) | Pico Rivera (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,378 | 63,750 |
| Income (median) | $31,042 | $36,529 |
| Home Value (median) | $155,800 | $380,200 |
| White | 78% | 55% |
| Black | 6% | 0% |
| Asian | 0% | 3% |
| With Kids | 59% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 28 | 36 |
| Rentals | 45% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Wasco or Pico Rivera?
A: Wasco has a much smaller population count than Pico Rivera: 26378 compared with 63750 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Wasco or in Pico Rivera?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Wasco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Wasco or Pico Rivera?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Wasco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Wasco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 45% for Wasco versus 33% for Pico Rivera.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Wasco may include: Madera, Delano, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z