Compare-Cities.com
Compare Wasco to Palm Springs
This post compares Wasco, California to Palm Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Wasco (city) | Palm Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,378 | 47,140 |
| Income (median) | $31,042 | $45,934 |
| Home Value (median) | $155,800 | $340,600 |
| White | 78% | 83% |
| Black | 6% | 4% |
| Asian | 0% | 4% |
| With Kids | 59% | 12% |
| Age (median) | 28 | 54 |
| Rentals | 45% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Wasco or Palm Springs?
A: Wasco has a smaller population count than Palm Springs: 26378 compared with 47140 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Wasco or in Palm Springs?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Wasco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Wasco or Palm Springs?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Wasco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Wasco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 45% for Wasco versus 41% for Palm Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Wasco may include: Madera, Delano, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z