Compare-Cities.com
Compare Wasco to Foothill Farms
This post compares Wasco, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Wasco (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,378 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $31,042 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $155,800 | $201,200 |
| White | 78% | 67% |
| Black | 6% | 9% |
| Asian | 0% | 5% |
| With Kids | 59% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 28 | 33 |
| Rentals | 45% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Wasco or Foothill Farms?
A: Wasco has a similar population count than Foothill Farms: 26378 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Wasco or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Wasco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Wasco or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Wasco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 45% for Wasco versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Wasco may include: Madera, Delano, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z