Compare-Cities.com
Compare Wasco to Bakersfield
This post compares Wasco, California to Bakersfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Wasco (city) | Bakersfield (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 26,378 | 372,680 |
Income (median) | $31,042 | $44,447 |
Home Value (median) | $155,800 | $228,400 |
White | 78% | 68% |
Black | 6% | 7% |
Asian | 0% | 7% |
With Kids | 59% | 45% |
Age (median) | 28 | 30 |
Rentals | 45% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Wasco or Bakersfield?
A: Wasco has a much smaller population count than Bakersfield: 26378 compared with 372680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Wasco or in Bakersfield?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Wasco.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Wasco or Bakersfield?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Wasco.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Wasco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 45% for Wasco versus 43% for Bakersfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Wasco may include: Madera, Delano, and Dinuba.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z