Compare-Cities.com
Compare Walnut Creek to Riverbank
This post compares Walnut Creek, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Walnut Creek (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 68,516 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $84,028 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $704,900 | $247,200 |
| White | 76% | 79% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 14% | 4% |
| With Kids | 21% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 48 | 32 |
| Rentals | 36% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Walnut Creek or Riverbank?
A: Walnut Creek has a larger population count than Riverbank: 68516 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Walnut Creek or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Walnut Creek.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Walnut Creek or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Walnut Creek.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Walnut Creek does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 36% for Walnut Creek versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Walnut Creek may include: Dana-Point, Laguna-Niguel, and Novato.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z