Compare-Cities.com
Compare Walnut Creek to Burbank
This post compares Walnut Creek, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Walnut Creek (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 68,516 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $84,028 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $704,900 | $574,300 |
| White | 76% | 70% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 14% | 11% |
| With Kids | 21% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 48 | 39 |
| Rentals | 36% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Walnut Creek or Burbank?
A: Walnut Creek has a smaller population count than Burbank: 68516 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Walnut Creek or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Walnut Creek.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Walnut Creek or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Walnut Creek.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 36% for Walnut Creek versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Walnut Creek may include: Dana-Point, Laguna-Niguel, and Novato.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z