Compare-Cities.com
Compare Visalia to South San Francisco
This post compares Visalia, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Visalia (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 130,047 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $44,703 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $207,400 | $697,400 |
| White | 78% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 5% | 39% |
| With Kids | 43% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 39 |
| Rentals | 40% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Visalia or South San Francisco?
A: Visalia has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 130047 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Visalia or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Visalia.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Visalia or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Visalia.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Visalia does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 40% for Visalia versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Visalia may include: Hanford, Reedley, and Hesperia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z