Compare-Cities.com
Compare Visalia to San Francisco
This post compares Visalia, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Visalia (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 130,047 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $44,703 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $207,400 | $927,400 |
| White | 78% | 47% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 5% | 34% |
| With Kids | 43% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 38 |
| Rentals | 40% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Visalia or San Francisco?
A: Visalia has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 130047 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Visalia or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Visalia.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Visalia or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Visalia.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 40% for Visalia versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Visalia may include: Hanford, Reedley, and Hesperia.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z